Posted: 23 April 2007 at 19:08 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hello,
I must contradict the thesis that each carrier of the medal is a hero.
I try to represent times my opinion.
In order to clarify my (German) opinion, I would first like to briefly represent the relationship of my family with the Second World War.
From my family many members were soldiers in the Second World War. 4 of uncle of my mother died, one is still missed. An uncle was wounded on the way after Stalingrad. My father lost a brother (member of the Kriegsmarine) and a brother-in-law. A brother and a brother-in-law were wounded. A brother came for 1.5 years into American war prison.
A widow in the neighbourhood of my father had 4 sons and a daughter. All four sons died in the war. One of their sons was Dietrich Schöneboom, commander of U-431. Carrier of the iron cross (1st class) and knight cross. My father told me that the mother had suffered her whole life under the loss of their sons. The medals of their son were there also no consolation.
None from my family and circle of friends, those the war survived spoke ever of heroism. There were heroes only in propaganda.
Most felt betrayed, for a wrong thing used for heating. They came into a destroyed and split country home, the result of their "heroful fight”.
They could not say like the allied soldiers that their blood tariff for the liberty of Europe was.
Medals were after the war only a piece sheet metal. A piece sheet metal that the will to strengthen should go over for the Führer into death.
Toward end of the war the medals became also mass-produced goods.
Also the award depended not always on acts, but also on relations and political necessities.
People such as Prien were developed partially purposefully as heroes, in order to strengthen the war will of the population.
Also one should with the statement that all carriers are heroes, considers that people carried such as Hitler, Goering and Goebels many medals. Medals were lent also to the SS men, whose achievements were based on the number of destroyed Jews.
Therefore am I the opinion that a medal is not equal to medals. The background of a medal must be always regarded, before one calls someone hero.
Therefore the hero anniversary imported after that 1 world war also after the Second World War in people mourning day was renamed.
One day, to which one intends the victims of the two world wars. One day for reminder at the following generations.
Thus, Prien and the other carriers were heroes? I say no, which was most like lambs, which one sacrificed.
Regards Holger
Edited by Holger on 23 April 2007 at 19:14
__________________ Holger
Hobby: RC-Modell der U-47 von Robbe
MFP F420
|