lw789
Bootsmann
Joined: 13 June 2018
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 510
|
| Posted: 30 July 2018 at 10:00 | IP Logged
|
|
|
Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule
enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants
to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca. Hi Kerry, As Im
sure youve seen, in Sundays game in Chicago between the
Blackhawks and the Edmonton Oilers, Chicago made an
unfortunate gaffe resulting in an own goal with their
goalie out of the net for an extra attacker. As the puck
slid toward the open net, Oilers forward Mark Arcobello
gave chase while Blackhawks defenceman Nick Leddy tried
to prevent it from crossing the goal line. Arcobello,
unable to touch the puck because of the Oilers delayed
penalty, changed course to slow Leddy down enough to
ensure the puck went in the net. Leddy really didnt have
a chance at stopping the puck, so his being slowed down
made no difference. But I was wondering, had it been a
close play, where Leddys path to the puck would have made
the difference between a goal and a save, would Arcobello
have been penalized for going out of his way to prevent
Leddy from accessing the puck? A disallowed goal?
Interference penalty (in addition to the delayed one)?
Or would that have been a legal play? Josh
BernierWinnipeg, Manitoba Hi Josh, It was a bizarre play
when Patrick Kane put the puck into his own unguarded net
during a delayed slashing penalty called against Oilers
goalie Devan Dubnyk. Kanes intended back-pass to the blue
line travelled the entire length of the ice and split the
wicket well before Blackhawks defenceman Nick Leddy could
reach the puck. You bring up an interesting point with
regard to a potential interference call on a play such as
this when Mark Arcobello sprinted across the path of Nick
Leddy. You correctly stated Josh, that Leddy was unable
to get to the puck in advance of it crossing the goal
line in spite of Arcobellos minimally invasive action.
The fact that Leddy could not have gotten to the puck in
time however, should have no bearing on whether an
interference penalty was warranted. As I am sure you
recall, the standard of enforcement for Rule 56
(Interference) changed drastically in the 2006 season
following a return from the first NHL lockout in a
concerted effort to eliminate what was then referred to
as "obstruction". Lets examine the language and
application of Rule 56 as it might apply to this
situation. • A strict standard on acts of interference
must be adhered to in all areas of the rink. • Body
position shall be determined as the player skating in
front of or beside his opponent, traveling in the same
direction. • A player is allowed the ice he is standing
on (body position) and is not required to move in order
to let an opponent proceed. A player may "block" the path
of an opponent provided he is in front of his opponent
and moving in the same direction. Moving laterally and
without establishing body position, then making contact
with the non-puck carrier is not permitted and will be
penalized as interference. • A player is always entitled
to use his body position to lengthen an opponents path to
the puck, provided his stick is not utilized (to make
himself "bigger" and therefore considerably lengthening
the distance his opponent must travel to get where he is
going). • A player delivering a "pick" is one who moves
into an opponents path without having body position,
thereby taking him out of the play. When this is done, an
interference penalty shall be assessed. On this play,
Arcobello executed a perfect, legal, "moving pick" when
he sprinted to gain the ice in advance of Leddy and
continued to move through that ice with very minimal
alteration to his speed and direction. It was especially
important that physical contact with the Hawks player did
not result. These were crucial components with regard to
the legality of the play since Arcobello cut laterally
across the path of his opponent as opposed to travelling
in front of or beside and in the same direction of Leddy.
If Arcobello, after deliberately moving laterally across
the path of Leddy, had slowed considerably, stopped or
made contact with Leddy, an interference penalty would
have been deserved whether Leddy could have prevented the
puck from entering the net or not. If that were to have
taken place, the referee should immediately blow his
whistle and assess a penalty to Arcobello for
interference in addition to the delayed penalty signaled
to Dubnyk. The subsequent goal would then be disallowed.
As we moved forward from 2006, the expected standard of
enforcement regarding interference is that the illegal
act should be penalized in all cases as opposed to the
result or consequence to the play!
Custom
Titans Jerseys .com) - Manu Ginobili capped off a
26-point night with a go-ahead layup with 24 seconds left
in overtime, with the basket giving the San Antonio Spurs
a much-needed 95-93 victory over the New Orleans
Pelicans. Friday-Xavier-Su-A-Filo-Jersey/">Xavier Sua-Filo Titans
Jersey . MacArthur scored two goals, and the
Senators outlasted Detroit in a testy third period to
beat the Red Wings 4-2 on Saturday night.
http://www.thetitansfansclub.com/Black-Friday-Luke-Falk-
Jersey/. The three goals bring Messis career tally for
Barcelona to 371 in all games -- including friendlies --
breaking the club record of 369 held by Paulino Alcantara
since 1927. The 26-year-old Messi was already the clubs
all-time leading scorer in official games. Messi assured
Barcelonas fans they will enjoy his goals for years to
come, saying "as long as people want me, I will stay
here. Bennie-Logan-Jersey/">Bennie Logan Jersey . Viewers
in the Jets region can watch the game on TSN Jets at
6:30pm ct/7:30pm et. The game is also avialable on TSN
Radio 1290 in Winnipeg at 7pm ct.
Stocker-Jersey/">Luke Stocker Titans Jersey .FIFA
said its appeals panel ruled the case not admissible.The
former U.S. Attorney had objected to ethics judge Joachim
Eckerts summary of the World Cup bid investigation,
claiming numerous materially incomplete and erroneous
representations of his work.SESTOLA, Italy -- Pieter
Weening of the Netherlands edged out Davide Malacarne to
win the ninth stage of the Giro dItalia on Sunday, while
Cadel Evans retained the overall lead. Weening had been
part of a breakaway group and apologized to Malacarne as
he sprinted past him at the end of the final climb of the
172-kilometre (107-mile) leg from Lugo to Sestola for his
second individual victory. A final burst from Domenico
Pozzovivo saw the Italian cyclist finish third, 42
seconds behind, with the peloton coming in 1 minute, 8
seconds after Weening. "The guys werent working perfect
in the group and it went slightly uphill," Weening said.
"At the roundabout I saw everybody going the wrong way
around and I came full speed on the right side and I felt
that this was the moment. Normally you wait for the climb
but this climb is not so steep to attack, so I thought I
would attack before the climb." The top three in the
overall standings remained unchanged and Evans has a 57-
second advantage over Rigoberto Uran. Rafal Majka is
third, while Pozzovivo moved up into fourth, 1:20 behind
Evans. "I think we have to be satisfied with our work so
far," Evans said. "The team, they put me in the position
Im in now. Im very proud of my guys and we will rest well
tomorrow." Victorias Ryder Hesjedal finished the stage in
14th and is 17th overall. Svein Tuft of Langley, B.C.,
was well back iin 161st and is now last overall in the
field at 181st.dddddddddddd Despite a relatively flat
opening half of the stage, the break took a while to form
with the peloton holding the pace high. A group of 14
riders eventually escaped 50K (31 miles) in and swiftly
built an advantage of more than seven minutes as the
peloton seemed happy to let them go, with no threat to
the overall lead among the escapees. However, with 35K
(22 miles) remaining, BMC put its foot down and the
peloton started slashing the gap which dropped to 3:19 at
the top of the second and penultimate climb. Weening saw
the danger and made his move, followed by Malacarne. The
pair built up an advantage of more than 35 seconds with
12K (7.5 miles) remaining and that was up to a minute as
they approached the steepest part of the final climb,
with gradients of 14 per cent. The duo worked together
before becoming more cagey in the final kilometre, each
waiting for the other to start the sprint. Malacarne made
his move with 250 metres to go, but Weening rounded him
to take his second victory in this years race, after
helping Orica-GreenEdge win the opening time trial.
Pozzovivo jumped from the peloton with less than 5K (3
miles) remaining, catching and passing Enrico Barbin to
finish third. Monday is a rest day before Tuesdays 10th
stage, which is one for the sprinters -- a flat 173K
(107.5-mile) leg from Modela to Salsomaggiore.
China
Jerseys Cheap
Cheap
Jerseys
Cheap NFL
Jerseys Wholesale
Discou
nt NFL Jerseys
Cheap
Jerseys 2020
Wholesale
Jerseys 2020
Wholesale
NFL White Jerseys ' ' '
|
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
U47.org Forum :: The Barracks
Topic: mb is not so steep to attack, so
